Is a Con-Con Coming? 35 States so far and Counting!
Dangerous, but this Ship is Already Sinking
A Dangerous Game in the Hands of Those who have Voted Against our Freedoms Continuously!
Contributing writer: Jay Friedman
Governors of 35 states have filed suit against the Federal Government for imposing unlawful burdens upon them. It only takes 38 (of the 50) States to convene a Constitutional Convention....
This news of an upcoming Constitutional Convention has been rolling around in recent days. Just hearing a couple of well known and fairly respected alternative media hosts speaking on this topic yesterday, got me wondering about all the Nay-Sayers telling us that it is all an urban legend. Snopes I always discount right off the bat, since they are made up of a few totally left wing ding-bats from California who have been caught on numerous occasions spreading their own agenda lies. I now tend to believe all of those types of online de-bunkers to be game players. If you are still looking to Snopes for any truth, you are seriously wasting your time, its Russian Roulette with that crew.
Among the de-bunkers I found this - MoveOn.Org 28th Amendment petition...... - I generally can't tolerate this crew either, but I also find it difficult to believe they would have this page running if it was nothing more than an easily proven urban legend. On that note, I will continue herein with my further thoughts on this very important subject regardless.
I used to believe that convening a Con-Con could aid to mitigate our countries growth away from the very documents it is founded upon, now It scares me more than anything.
Look at most of the States Governors and legislators, do they vote our way and towards the absolute, guaranteed protections of that Constitution, or even the States individual constitutions most of the time? So now, this very week they are actually, for the first time in our history since its authorship, working towards convening a full blown Constitutional Convention? So far 35 of the States are on board with convening a Con-Con! We only require 38 States to make that happen, and then what?
Are all of our not so dependable, much less loyal State law makers suddenly going to change their colors in a most drastic way? After how many years of total Executive branch oligarchical attitudes which have given way to god knows how many totally Unconstitutional Executive Orders, all of which were used or will be used in the future to circumvent our constitutional laws of the land! I have heard it reported that our current CEO of the corporate constitutional body wrote 800+ executive orders during his first term, and now another 1000 or so during his second reign of destruction. Are we now to believe that three quarters (3/4) of our limp-wristed law makers suddenly found a backbone and are going to completely eviscerate all of them, from all Presidential CEO's?
"There is no constitutional provision nor statute that explicitly permits executive orders. The term executive power Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, refers to the title of President as the executive. He is instructed therein by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5 or face impeachment. Most executive orders use these Constitutional reasoning's as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President's sworn duties,the intent being to help direct officers of the U.S. Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office."
An executive order of the president must find support in the Constitution, either in a clause granting the president specific power, or by a delegation of power by Congress to the president.
So now we see that we do NOT require a Con-Con for them to do that, which would go a LONG way to righting our suffering Republic.
This alleged call for a Con-Con has me very worried because I, as many of you, have now come to see just how absolutely underhanded and flat out evil all of them can be. Like one giant interbred family of narcissists and sociopaths. Virtually all of them have been completely immune to any prosecution or legal actions, much less arrest for outright and blatant Federal and State infractions that are so easily provable. To know this is true we only need to look at Hillary Clinton. She not only orchestrated and facilitated illegal arms sales to our own enemies through Benghazi, which has yet again been proven by at least three CIA and other Special Forces operators that she hasn't had the chance to murder yet, but she also got one US Ambassador and other Special Forces troopers killed to cover it all up, or so she hoped. Either way, even a whiff of such actions should have at the very least gotten her fired and disbarred. Then, we find out that she was spiriting highly classified documents out of "our" government offices to her home. Then, after illegally storing those documents off site, she then sets up her very own server system, of which we have no doubt was connected online, and did not have anywhere near the same level of security compared to their original safe location. To top of this fiasco, which so far is a pile of federal infractions that would have landed all of us in Ft. Leavenworth approx. five minutes after being arrested for them; when she was caught, she then destroyed the servers and tried to hide her emails, etc! It is a Federal offence to destroy classified government documents or any other type of communications, much less those materials that the US government law enforcement agencies have warrants for! This section carries a fine of 250k and or imprisonment for 10 years, and or both, as well as stripping that official from ever holding any public office again! But running for the highest office? No problem!
And NOW she is in the running for the Presidency!
On the other side of seeing this as a grand and very possible conspiracy to reduce or remove the original Constitution for the long lobbied for U.N Charter constitution, here is the only anomaly I see in all this.
Virtually every single Left-Wing Socialist traitor/law-maker for as long as I can remember, has voiced their staunch and even alarmist opposition to ever convening a Con-Con.
Personally, again looking at the voting records of our State law makers on both sides, I never quite understood why the left continued to be so ardently against it. In my mind I have always believed that allowing a Con-Con to be convened would most assuredly prove to be the absolute and final end of this great Republic, finalized in the largest internal shooting war in human history, or worse, in a whimper!
Has their ongoing and loud opposition been nothing more than a ruse? Feigning their opposition so that when the Con-Con came to pass, and their most evil plans were finally brought to fruition, with the total evisceration of it, maybe even superseded by their U.N constitution? At which point they could scream plausible deniability and blame the majority, usually RED State laws makers for this final nail!
When it comes to the evil involved in trying to destroy the original great values and culture of this once great and chase nation, I dissolved all boundaries in my paradigm that pertain to the depth and breadth of their evil. As should you! I am from Missouri, and I say SHOW ME something different and in total opposition to that evil, and THEN MAYBE I will begin to believe in the availability of goodness once again.
Another anomaly that we have watched occur from the left is their propensity to circumvent the organic "law of the land" Constitution through the use of Federal judges and Supreme court judges to "reinterpret" the Constitution for them. Of course when they do this they tell us that those judges are "interpreting" its ancient archaic wording, however this has always been a lie, since the simple and plain language it is written in requires no new interpretations unless you are purposely attempting to circumvent the LAW! It has long been the complaint of those within the socialist party that the Constitution was "too hard" to change. So they have used these judges to make their required changed de facto and piecemeal, slow but steadily in the direction of a communist oligarch system.
"Woodrow Wilson openly declared the Constitution an impediment to the kinds of “reforms” the Progressive movement wanted, and urged judges to “interpret” the Constitution in such a way as to loosen its limits on federal power."
This judicial tyranny process has been on going for generations, so that today government officials at the local, state or national level can often seize private property in disregard of the plain and most absolute 5th Amendment’s protections.
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation".
Now my final question is; 'why do we need a Con-Con?'
All the law makers know full well that DC has not been running under the original organic Constitution since at least 1871 (see articles below). They dam well know that DC and subsequently every single State and County and most townships have been under articles of "incorporation" since then, and NOT running under the organic law of the land, much less by Common Law Courts! THEY ALL KNOW THIS!
The original framers of our Constitution laid out quite clearly and in plain language, which requires no new interpretation, that ANY LAWS made which are CONTRARY or in OPPOSITION to the entirety of the Constitution, are automatically NULL & VOID! And that all States have the final right of all Federal law interpretations as they should be compared to our Constitution and the framers original intent. So again I ask, why the Con-Con?
"The understanding of nullification is based on a view that the States formed the Union by an agreement (or "compact") among the States, and that as creators of the federal government, the States have the final authority to determine the limits of the power of that government. The related idea of interposition is a theory that a state has the right and the duty to "interpose" itself when the federal government enacts laws that the state believes to be unconstitutional. Thomas Jeffersonand James Madison set forth the theories of nullification and interposition in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions in 1798."
"Courts at the state and federal level, including the U.S. Supreme Court, repeatedly have rejected the theory of nullification.The courts have decided that under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, federal law is superior to state law, and that under Article III of the Constitution, the federal judiciary has the final power to interpret the Constitution. Therefore, the power to make final decisions about the constitutionality of federal laws lies with the federal courts, not the states, and the states do not have the power to nullify federal laws."
Yes! No kidding the traitorous interlopers in DC believe and enforce such a clearly Unconstitutional law and attitude towards the States. That is because NO ONE KNOWS THEIR HISTORY! Again, see both very important articles at the end of this blog! And you will finally understand HOW and WHY they believe they have such sweeping rights over the people and the States! Hint.....No one ever thinks to ask - "Which Constitution!"
The disconnect clearly appears to be among virtually ALL of the law makers, throughout ALL of the States, and regardless of party affiliation; in that not one of them has offered up the idea, or wants to "convene" the entirety of our Constitutional Sheriffs and U.S Marshals to go forth in one day and arrest every single law maker, right up to El Presidente himself and everyone in between, who has acted against the organic law of this land, and for all their blatant and easily provable acts of open treason against "The People" and against The Constitution!
WHY is THIS Extreme and Harsh action required to save the Republic and our Children?
Again, I direct your attention to Mrs. Hillary C, her philandering, murderous husband, the other 535 men and women, most of whom have serious police records under their belts, as do many of the other gutless or corrupted State law makers. The reason WHY such an immediate and extreme action is required, is because they are all 100% complicit in many other illegal, lewd and unchaste activities. All of which have long been used against each member therein in order to both, coax them into far deeper and more evil venues and operations, as well as to make certain none of their counterparts can or will ever dare to work openly and lawfully against them. Everyone there has dirt on everyone else
Therefore we are left with no other choice than to "throw off" the government we have, in order to form a new one. Exactly as our original, organic Constitution dictates and provides for THE PEOPLE to do! Alas, that MUST begin with mass arrests and deportations!
Lengthy trials are not required, only the lefts own tribunals should be used to speed the process since the absolute and overwhelming proof of their treason is easily identified and on the record.
Send them back to the socialist homelands in Europe that they love and revere so much.
Germany and other Euro-States have already proven to being open to taking the refugees and criminals from many other countries which have absolutely no cultural similarities to their own. Taking back and making room for a few thousand Anti-American scum and their families should be a no-brainer for those loving, socialist European countries.
Even better! We now know that there are hundreds of thousands of vacant houses in Syria! So if the Europeans don't want them AFTER they arrive on their beaches via the rubber dingys provided by our merchant marines, the Euro-governments can spend their own money to send them on to Syria! If worse comes to worse, we can be certain that their good friends in ISIS will welcome them all with open arms. Especially their women and daughters!
Another great point to consider in this most needed scenario is, that NOW would be the best time for these sweeping arrests. With the elections coming up, the people in all States can now pull all "KNOWN" Constitutionally minded and proven individuals for the vacated elected offices. It can all be done on line for the most part as Iceland very successfully did, and the true spirit of a Constitutional American Republic can emerge victorious!
I may sound like I am joking in some of this, however I am not. If the American people do not take such an action soon, with such illegal United Nations actions like the "safe cities" initiative being implemented by U.N officials and NATO police in Texas and other States as you read this, then all will soon be lost.
Stay safe America!
Very Important additional older articles on this very subject!